City Council Tracker / Monday, March 23, 2026
K1 high priority Recorded vote

Public hearing and zoning amendment request for 599 W. Princeton Drive (Ironwood at Princeton)

Council approved the Ironwood zoning amendment 6-0, but added multiple changes focused on covered parking dimensions, a covered student bus stop, mold-testing certification, and council control over changes.

Vote Tracker

Approved 6-0 with additional council changes.

Motion by Cristina Todd. Second by Bryan Washington. Approval included the added conditions described by the user plus city staff recommendations.

Eugene Escobar Jr.

Mayor

not voting

Terrance Johnson

Place 1

yes

Cristina Todd

Place 2

yes

Bryan Washington

Place 3

yes

Vacant

Place 4

vacant

Steve Deffibaugh

Place 5

yes

Ben Long

Place 6

yes

Carolyn David-Graves

Place 7

yes

Why This Matters

This was not a clean yes-or-no approval of the original proposal. Council approved K1 with added conditions, including covered parking spaces sized at 10 by 18, a covered bus stop with location to be coordinated after discussion with the school district, a new mold-testing certification submitted to the city, and removal of language allowing the city manager to approve minor changes so that changes come back to council instead. That makes the vote important not just because the project moved forward, but because council inserted more public-facing guardrails into the approval.

Why we flagged it: This was one of the meeting’s biggest land-use decisions because it affects a highly visible stalled multifamily project on U.S. 380.

What approval means

The zoning amendment can move forward, but with added conditions tied to parking, a student bus stop, mold certification, and council-level oversight of future changes.

If it had failed

The requested amendment would have been denied or delayed, leaving the project tied to its prior framework and unresolved conditions.

Potential Pros

  • Moves a high-profile stalled project forward while adding extra conditions.
  • Council removed language that could have allowed future changes to stay out of public view.

Potential Cons

  • Approval still advances a controversial multifamily project along a sensitive corridor.
  • Some project details still depend on later implementation and oversight.

Related Coverage

Ironwood: The Full Q&A

Read related reporting →

Tracker Note

This tracker entry is based on the official agenda and the meeting notes currently captured by The Princeton Journal. If official minutes, video, or backup records clarify anything further, the tracker can be updated to match the final record.